Over two thousand monographic studies and countless essays and articles in the field of «enterprise history» - very inadequately defined as the socialist response to capitalist business history - were published in the German Democratic Republic between 1949 and 1990. In a development parallel to that in the Soviet Union, the «history of factories and production plants», later more comprehensively called «enterprise history», was meant to contribute to the «battle of ideologies» during the Cold War. Like local and regional historiography, enterprise history served as a didactic tool and as a integral part of adult education, because it attempted to enhance the «socialist consciousness» of the working population. Ordinary working people encouraged to write the histories of their production plants, cooperatives or (later) collective farms were, supposedly, instilled with pride in their places of work, their home, and in the achievements of socialist economy as a whole. Within the production centres, initiatives in, help with, and control of historiographical activities resided with the ruling party\'s representatives; they were responsible for the output\'s ideological faithfulness to the party line. This attempt at a historiographical «mass-movement» failed, however, since not enough volunteers could be recruited to invest time and energy into enterprise history projects. Regional consulting centres were not able to save the state\'s ambitious goal of a history by workers for workers.
With the New Economic System of the 1960s, enterprise history received fresh impulses from a stronger inclusion of business management aspects. The aim now was to show how, in the past, the working class had successfully overcome economic and technical difficulties, thus ideally motivating the workers for even greater efforts in the future. With the political EastWest-détente and in an attempt to raise the quality of research, the writing of enterprise history was made to shift from the workers at their production plants to historians, archives, and libraries and was thus «professionalized». Verbal confrontations with the capitalist system declined in number and gravity, while analyses of economic, technical, sociological and mathematical questions gained importance. The innovative power of the capitalist system and its entrepreneurs was even acknowledged. As to the use of sources, oral history as a specifically «socialist» source lost its influence, and the enterprise historian now turned to traditional sources, even to the commemorative publications of capitalist companies.
Despite the often still questionable content of enterprise history publications, the efforts to expand this branch of historiography for its ideological function were intensive by the ruling party, the SED, since 1977. Within scarcely one decade, over 1.800 local enterprise history committees with almost 20.000 members were created. One important result of their work were the so-called «Tradition cabinets» or small exhibitions.
Even more than general economic history, enterprise history in the German Democratic Republic was utilized to legitimize the rule of the SED, which resulted in the ideological lobsidedness and partiality of every publication. As main fact collections, documentations, or bibliographical aids, though, they may still be helpful for today\'s business historians.